Disco_Steve ·
a small poll for you all. Hopefully it will guide the Devs (and us!) along with the new marketing director about what we want.
Please be truthfull, and put what you think, not what you think is the 'cool' answer
From the original SynthMaker forum (2004–2014), with its members’ names and dates.
Disco_Steve ·
a small poll for you all. Hopefully it will guide the Devs (and us!) along with the new marketing director about what we want.
Please be truthfull, and put what you think, not what you think is the 'cool' answer
MichaelBenjamin ·
cant choose, it lacks the option: i am willing to pay an upgrade price in range about 1/4 of full sm (~50€) to what is basically sm 1.1.8 and further support development to sm 2.0 with another upgrade price that could be half full price ~100€ (stable green timing, more codebox commands, better ootb asm optimisations, and general further expanding of dsp possibilities).
infuzion ·
MichaelBenjamin wrote: cant choose, it lacks the option: i am willing to pay an upgrade price in range about 1/4 of full sm (~50€) to what is basically sm 1.1.8 and further support development to sm 2.0 with another upgrade price that could be half full price ~100€ (stable green timing, more codebox commands, better ootb asm optimisations, and general further expanding of dsp possibilities).
I'd agree, but FlowStone is more like SM1.2 or SM1.5 to me.
MyCo ·
I won't give a cent for flowstone... but I would pay for S|M again when this helps to get the focus of the developers back to their loyal user base.
DigitalWhiteByte ·
I agree with MYCO, I have bought SYNTHMAKER not FLOWSTONE, I hope that the updates are coming. I believe that this community of people, faithful and collaborative, has given strong support to the man company, so you can now create a new business unit based on the same project, I wish him all the luck. however, gladly would pay to see updated SynthMaker, and see at least solved the problems which now has more.
stw ·
Until now i wouldn't give anything for a rebranding of a buggy software i already own. I would pay an upgrade fee for Flowstone or SM or whatever it is called if someone from Outsim can guarantee that the most urgent issues like VST2.4 and others get sorted. BTW what's really disgusting me is that since Flowstone is out its support forum is reguarly visited and updated by malc (or whoever is doing anything at Outsim) and the SM forum mainly the bug reports are cared with silence. The other Flowstostone thread at the OT forum includes some notes about the value of the active SM user base which i strongly subscribe. I feel that these users which alredy brought their input to SM are kicked in the ass right now! 😠
Wrote something here? To have a post removed or your name hidden, write to [email protected].