But I don’t know why it consumes much less CPU in slower system! In the first setup my schematic consumes 4.4% CPU in stable mode and 16.3% when a note is pressed but in the second system 2% usage for stable mode and 8.9% when a note is pressed.
Is there any other reason that affects CPU usage for SM based plugin?
MyCo ·
What are the settings for ASIO? Samplerate and Buffersize (Latency) are important.
Iman ·
MyCo wrote: What are the settings for ASIO? Samplerate and Buffersize (Latency) are important.
I tried different sample rates and buffersize with no luck solving this issue, Now I run at :
1-44100 20ms For P4
2-44100 12ms For Celeron !
I installed CPUz on both systems. P4 2.4 is winner in all parameters except L1 catch which on Celeron M it is double :
P4 2.4 : L1 Data cache 16 KBytes - L2 cache 1024 KByte
CE 1.5 : L1 Data cache 32 KBytes - L2 cache 512 KBytes
No idea ?
MyCo ·
May be, the P4 denormals and the Celeron doesn't
FreeRideSkier ·
I think you’ll find it’s your soundcard.
You have more I/O and that has an overhead.
Also not all drivers are made equal! I used to work for a Soundcard manufacturer and you wouldn’t believe how the speed and efficiency of the drivers vary from different manufacturers.
Wrote something here? To have a post removed or your name hidden, write to [email protected].