From the original SynthMaker forum (2004–2014), with its members’ names and dates.
MichaelBenjamin ·
i dont know if this came up before. this code streamin a; streamout b;
stage(0) { a=b; }
stage(1) { b=a; }
when connected to text gives this:
streamin a; streamout b; stage0; //Assignment> sLeft=b movaps xmm0,b; movaps a,xmm0; stage1; stage1; //Assignment> sLeft=a movaps xmm0,a; movaps b,xmm0; stage1;
3x stage 1 and 1x stage 0. is this correct? i would rather think that stage has to be at start and end, so 2x stage0 and 2x stage1, like the jump markers.
exonerate ·
Not a bug as such, certainly has no effect on anything.
defining stage 1 actually signals the end of stage 0, so there's no need to have the code in between two stage zeros
the stage 1 doesn't actually have to be defined, anything written in the code component is automatically calculated in stage 1.
Without defining stage 1 in code the ASM is...
streamin a;streamout b; stage0; //Assignment> sLeft=b movaps xmm0,b; movaps a,xmm0; stage1; //Assignment> sLeft=a movaps xmm0,a; movaps b,xmm0;
I don't think the extra stage ones will have any effect on anything, AFAICT the stage 1 ect is not actual ASM, but commands to Synthmaker's internal parser to treat that section of code differently.
Cheers 😉
Exo
infuzion ·
exonerate wrote: Not a bug as such, certainly has no effect on anything.... I don't think the extra stage ones will have any effect on anything
I got the same reply from a dev a year or so ago. Though it would be nice Code did not output confusing text 😉
MichaelBenjamin ·
ok, so i just ignore it.
Wrote something here? To have a post removed or your name hidden, write to [email protected].
SynthMaker