From the original SynthMaker forum (2004–2014), with its members’ names and dates.
kirkagur ·
hi
i want to make a smooth phaser/flanger ,with the regular interpolation delay lot of high freq added to the sound when moving the delay time.
i think that with more accurate interpolation the results will be better sound delay.
any one made one??? 🙂
bootsy ·
I've seen somewhere around here a thread were different algos are compared. Did you found that?
kirkagur ·
yes there is a broken link to the OSM 🙁 🙁 🙁
sunsynth ·
Which link kirkagur???
SUNsynth
stefan ·
What about this one?
kirkagur ·
sunsynth wrote: Which link kirkagur???
SUNsynth
this link.... [old link]
on this page 3th order interpolated delay updated
stefan wrote: What about this one?
this is 2 point interpolation i need 4 point or any thing better.....
A different types of interpolation delays should be standart modules in SM
sunsynth ·
Hi kirkagur again...
you can find the file in the Wiki-Effects-Section:
Link
kirkagur ·
thank you again!
anther Q.....
for what do i need this in the feedback chain? (its called DNC)
streamin in; streamout out; out = in + 1e-010; out = out - 1e-010;
rl ·
it's a denormal prevention jutsu.
kirkagur ·
how this cold prevent denormal?
rl ·
When the floating point registers hold a very small value (under a certain threshold) the CPU goes into denormal mode, which increases accuracy, but slows down the CPU. By setting the register to 0 (zero) the CPU would leave denormal mode, but it would be neccessary to detect whether the CPU is in denormal mode or not. By adding a small value (typically 1e-18) and subtracting it again the CPU leaves denormal mode and denormal detection can be skipped.
Here is a good article on the topic: http://ldesoras.free.fr/doc/articles/denormal-en.pdf
Wrote something here? To have a post removed or your name hidden, write to [email protected].
SynthMaker