aliasant ·
As it is now precision can never be better then 100times/sec Thats not very good on a samplerate/44100 times/sec signal
I was thinking. Couldnt this be written so that it listens to maybe 256 samples in a chunk. And sends out only the biggest one?
So eg:44100/25= 172.2656 times/sec.
44100/512=86.13 times/sec
44100/1500=29.4 times/sec maybe this is a good one?
Is this possible without using more cycles then we do today? If it is it would be much much better for graphical display.