From the original SynthMaker forum (2004–2014), with its members’ names and dates.
TomC ·
[...this is a crosspost from the 'Bug' subforum...]
infuzion wrote: Suggested Solution: Just have a single "Wireless Out" (not 2 like now), with a right-click property that set is it transmits to only inner-sub-modules, parent's sub-modules, or all over the entire schematic (well, 3rd option for a later version; don't want to hold progress up 🙂 ). It would be best if the actual connector had an icon to see instantly what mode it is in (like you can see the transmission signal now).
More general approach: let me select whether a wireless goes:
- all modules down from the current one (same as the 'wireless' link is now)
- all modules down from the parent module (same as 'wireless out' is now)
- stays within the same module (clears up schematics)
- goes up only
- is globally visible, no matter if it's up, down or in the same module
Of course implementing a 'find corresponding wireless receivers' is a must
to handle this.
Tom
Acrobat ·
TomC wrote: [...this is a crosspost from the 'Bug' subforum...]
infuzion wrote: Suggested Solution: Just have a single "Wireless Out" (not 2 like now), with a right-click property that set is it transmits to only inner-sub-modules, parent's sub-modules, or all over the entire schematic (well, 3rd option for a later version; don't want to hold progress up 🙂 ). It would be best if the actual connector had an icon to see instantly what mode it is in (like you can see the transmission signal now).
More general approach: let me select whether a wireless goes:
- all modules down from the current one (same as the 'wireless' link is now)
- all modules down from the parent module (same as 'wireless out' is now)
- stays within the same module (clears up schematics)
- goes up only
- is globally visible, no matter if it's up, down or in the same module
Of course implementing a 'find corresponding wireless receivers' is a must
to handle this.
Tom
I think there's a lot of confusion and a plenty of post on the argument.... 😕 😕
TomC ·
Acrobat wrote:
I think there's a lot of confusion and a plenty of post on the argument.... 😕 😕
??
Wrote something here? To have a post removed or your name hidden, write to [email protected].