imekon ·
Something I'm working on...
I think I'll replace all the various knobs with a numerical thingy.
What's the easiest way to create the presets?
From the original SynthMaker forum (2004–2014), with its members’ names and dates.
imekon ·
Something I'm working on...
I think I'll replace all the various knobs with a numerical thingy.
What's the easiest way to create the presets?
db ·
imekon wrote:
Something I'm working on...
I think I'll replace all the various knobs with a numerical thingy.
What's the easiest way to create the presets?
Looks real nice! 🙂
Reminds me of Audio Damage 914 Fixed Filter Bank. Good stuff!
http://www.audiodamage.com/product_info ... ucts_id=14
imekon ·
Next step is to replace all the different knobs with this:
(schema: http://www.imekon.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/SynthMaker/numerical.osm)
Needs a bit more work, but more interesting than knobs!
skOre ·
I'd seriously doubt that. People will always like to change some kind of knob better than tweaking pure numbers. Maybe think of something that is crazier than knobs 😀
infuzion ·
skOre wrote: I'd seriously doubt that. People will always like to change some kind of knob better than tweaking pure numbers. Maybe think of something that is crazier than knobs 😀
I think Abelton did OK with alot of number-only inputs (eg BPM). I don't mind if it makes sence.
skOre ·
hmm, true. Yet I think that one should not overdo it. There are certain fields where it definately makes sense (like bpm, where you need numbers), others are just tweaked until one likes the sound...
GaryG ·
if you want something flakier then you could use my 'port' of Ian Kraklis tumbla control: http://www.snadsie.f2s.com/tumbla.osm
.g
imekon ·
Nice!
Wrote something here? To have a post removed or your name hidden, write to [email protected].