SynthMaker

extended syntax for state machine

Archive · 2005 1 old post

From the original SynthMaker forum (2004–2014), with its members’ names and dates.

NothanUmber ·

It would be nice if one could write something like that:

s0;1->1; # go to state 1 if the gate is open s1;0->0;2..inf->2; # state 0: gate closes, state 2: any triggers arrive while the gate is open s2;0->0; # state 0: gate closes

so you have essentially such a syntax:

s[0-9999];({-inf,inf,[0-9999]}(...{-inf,inf,[0-9999]})?;)+\ *(#{0-9,a-z,A-Z}*)?

That would be helpful because in one schematic of mine there are many input wires on the control input of a state machine so any control value bigger or equal 2 should go to state 2 without having to hardcode all possible variants.

Greetings, NothanUmber

Wrote something here? To have a post removed or your name hidden, write to [email protected].

Before your first post

A few rules keep this a friendly place. You agree to them once.

Shown next to what you post, here and in the app. It doesn’t have to be your real name: 3–24 lower-case letters, digits or _ (capitals become lower case, spaces become _).

    Then your post goes up straight away.

    Delete this reply?

    Open it in SynthMaker?

    It goes on the track you’re editing there, in place of that track’s sound, and into My sounds. Your other tracks stay as they are.

    Want to keep that track’s sound? Start a new song in SynthMaker first (Song › New song), then open this.

    Report this reply?

    Only the developer reads reports. The person isn’t told who reported them.

    What’s wrong with it?

    Block this person?

    You won’t see their posts and replies here any more. They aren’t told, and you can unblock them at any time.

    People you’ve blocked

    Their posts and replies are hidden from you. Unblock someone to see them again.

    The community rules

    A few rules keep this a friendly place. Everyone agrees to them once, before their first post.