SynthMaker

FlowStone 3, VST and x64

Archive · 2012 10 old posts

From the original SynthMaker forum (2004–2014), with its members’ names and dates.

kaj ·

infuzion wrote: support wrote: Frames of floats can also be passed back to Mono too. This will allow you to do audio processing in Ruby code but you will get a performance hit. You will also be able to pass a frame to an external dll for processing.

According to FlowStone V2 User Guide (p.126),

CoreStyler ·

I just buyed it.. But continues to save VST in 2.3.4 format!.. was not promised 2.4?

trogluddite ·

CoreStyler wrote: I just buyed it.. But continues to save VST in 2.3.4 format!.. was not promised 2.4?

First post of this thread...

Malc wrote: Much has been said about SynthMaker slipping behind in terms of specific audio technologies. Clearly this is something we have to rectify. In FlowStone 3 we will begin that process and upgrade plugin export to VST2.4. So VST2.4 will be in the FlowStone 3 release.

Get straight onto them with an e-mail - if you've paid your money then they have no excuse not to give you an explanation.

infuzion ·

trogluddite wrote: CoreStyler wrote: I just buyed it.. But continues to save VST in 2.3.4 format!.. was not promised 2.4?

Get straight onto them with an e-mail - if you've paid your money then they have no excuse not to give you an explanation.

"Look before you leap."

malc ·

Easy now - it's all there as promised. CoreStyler just exported to a different folder - easy mistake to make, I know I've done it enough times myself! 🙂

CoreStyler ·

malc wrote: Easy now - it's all there as promised. CoreStyler just exported to a different folder - easy mistake to make, I know I've done it enough times myself! 🙂

Yes.. 2.4 is true!. Yesterday was late... and i saved in a wrong path.. then loaded the old plugin! 😕 1000 excuses

Cyforce ·

Btw, what are not the big differences between vst 2.3 and 2.4?

trogluddite ·

malc wrote: Easy now - it's all there as promised

Sorry Malc - in hindsight that was worded a bit strong! 😊 😍 I was more my intention to get CoreStyler to get some confirmation from you than an accusation, as few of the rest of us were in a position test this just at the moment.

TomC ·

Cyforce wrote: Btw, what are not the big differences between vst 2.3 and 2.4?

The reference VST host (Steinberg's Cubase) only fully supports VST 2.4 and newer, so some features of SynthMaker didn't work with Cubase anymore.

Tom

malc ·

@trogluddite, no problem at all 🙂

Wrote something here? To have a post removed or your name hidden, write to [email protected].

Before your first post

A few rules keep this a friendly place. You agree to them once.

Shown next to what you post, here and in the app. It doesn’t have to be your real name: 3–24 lower-case letters, digits or _ (capitals become lower case, spaces become _).

    Then your post goes up straight away.

    Delete this reply?

    Open it in SynthMaker?

    It goes on the track you’re editing there, in place of that track’s sound, and into My sounds. Your other tracks stay as they are.

    Want to keep that track’s sound? Start a new song in SynthMaker first (Song › New song), then open this.

    Report this reply?

    Only the developer reads reports. The person isn’t told who reported them.

    What’s wrong with it?

    Block this person?

    You won’t see their posts and replies here any more. They aren’t told, and you can unblock them at any time.

    People you’ve blocked

    Their posts and replies are hidden from you. Unblock someone to see them again.

    The community rules

    A few rules keep this a friendly place. Everyone agrees to them once, before their first post.