From the original SynthMaker forum (2004–2014), with its members’ names and dates.
tester ·
I was thinking. Is there a way of smoothly connect/activate oscillators?
For example I have free running oscillator, and to it's input node (frequency or phase) there is another oscillator connected. Second oscillator is turned on, and it's output is smoothly (de zipper like) increased to maximum.
But it's not a simple "multiply primitive" switching, in which this oscillator would be running in the background. Smooth transition from zero to max, after the oscillator changes it's state from inactive to active (like in passing through selector/multiplexer).
And after it's turned off - first smooth transition to zero, then deactivation.
It's a simplified description/example.
I'm trying to figure out how to combine "live usage" with trigger related issues in order to remove glitches.
stw ·
trogluddite has done a code switching through hopping. IIRC it contained in/out fading of the signal? If not you can do the fading with a simple lopass in the code which controls the output of the signal.
I didn't search for it but i know it's here... anywhere.... 😉
However the downside of that approach is that you can only switch what is inside the asm code and you can only switch all four sse channels at once.
Unfortunately that's the only way of switching streams without the use of selectors and the only way to prevent glitches from a recompile introduced by the switches.
tester ·
Ehm,
"trogluddite has done a code switching through hopping" - help 🙂 which one was it? Does it works with SM stock oscillators too?
"fading with a simple lopass in the code which controls the output of the signal" - an example would be helpful.
Generally I'm turning on/off pairs of oscillators (stereo design). I went back to SM stock sine oscillators because of even worse glitches I had on sine designs from other thread (which I need to research again).
stw ·
tester wrote: "trogluddite has done a code switching through hopping" - help 🙂 which one was it? Does it works with SM stock oscillators too?
There're some examples in his recent toolbox. E.g. the reverb he designed uses that kind of "switching".
tester wrote: Generally I'm turning on/off pairs of oscillators (stereo design). I went back to SM stock sine oscillators because of even worse glitches I had on sine designs from other thread (which I need to research again).
As i said the downside of this method is that you can only "switch" or better expressed - bypass code which is nested inside the asm module. That means you can't bypass any stock modules. If you're going to switch anything but pure asm code you're comitted to the stock switcher.
Wrote something here? To have a post removed or your name hidden, write to [email protected].
SynthMaker