Yuroun ·
I like Alchemy's delay, so I made one in SM for use in my own future projects. It's not an exact copy. This is the simple version of it.
From the original SynthMaker forum (2004–2014), with its members’ names and dates.
Yuroun ·
I like Alchemy's delay, so I made one in SM for use in my own future projects. It's not an exact copy. This is the simple version of it.
rl ·
hint: you can "pack" the left and right channels together thus needing only one set of delay/amp/filter modules resulting in less cpu cycles (just use a pack4 module at beginning and an unpack at end)
Yuroun ·
rl wrote: hint: you can "pack" the left and right channels together thus needing only one set of delay/amp/filter modules resulting in less cpu cycles (just use a pack4 module at beginning and an unpack at end)
If I do that, are the channels (left and right) then still separated? I wan't to choose between different filtertypes for the channels e.g. a low filter on the left and a high filter on the right.
rl ·
You are damn right. I shouldn't throw hints into the forums so easily. Its a bit more complicated, e.g. the selector cannot be controlled from within a stream and has to be replaced by some self coded selector (see code). Not fully tested but the result looks good in the analyzer
(edit: attachment deleted, see below)
Yuroun ·
rl wrote: You are damn right. I shouldn't throw hints into the forums so easily. Its a bit more complicated, e.g. the selector cannot be controlled from within a stream and has to be replaced by some self coded selector (see code). Not fully tested but the result looks good in the analyzer:
I don't know why, but your version is missing the delay.
rl ·
because I forgot to connect! 😊
here is a better version:
Yuroun ·
rl wrote: because I forgot to connect! 😊
here is a better version:
Hahhaa yes, I saw that mistake 🙂
Thanks for the optimization and for the learning experience 😀
Wrote something here? To have a post removed or your name hidden, write to [email protected].