KVRaudio

CoreStyler · 18 Oct 2011

I think KVR add just (or in a major part) plugins from big companies (waves, steinberg..). I tried to add my listing but they do not and do not reply to my submission.... KVR is an hystorical site, but need to be more "user-friendly"... Will be better a way for adding synths or effects by ourself... then they just approve or reject. 🙂

tor · 18 Oct 2011

Yes I partly agree. They could have a system for developers to edit the release information database them selves. But I think it is necessary for KVR to approve all listings, new information and developers. Otherwise it will probablybe very chaotic. I just did a reread of this:

http://www.kvraudio.com/submissions.php

I then noticed I forgot some information regarding my new compressor. That might be the reason they skipped the updates aswell. I dont know. They have lots of information to keep track of so if they dont get all info they need you might be deprioriticed.

CoreStyler · 18 Oct 2011

When i tried to add Hardcore Kicks VSTi. i added all the informations about.. I used the schema in that page. 😀 I submitted this twice.. no reply.. no listing...

For me is better if they add the possibility for us to add manually the plugs... So they don't need to do nothing and can publish or delete the submission quickly and easily. Probably, the site is developed in a way that is difficult to do.... I will maybe create a "listing" site for vst plugins and/or samples in the future............. With user submission when registered.

tor · 18 Oct 2011

I guess it is hard to compete with the more established audio software databases/forums already out there. KVR will probably always be nr 1. On the page I link to they claim that they want all plugins to be listed. It is sad if they neglate your submission. 😕

infuzion · 19 Oct 2011

Other SM VST have been posted on their listing before; seems best if you aren't know is to post the VST on the forum first.

stw · 19 Oct 2011

I Published only once. it took app. 2 weeks before it appeared but i had no troubles with KVR so far.

tor · 19 Oct 2011

Ill just have to be a little patient then, and cross my fingers that they include all new info. It is not really that big deal either. It is free stuff so I do not miss out on anything 🙂

philter5 · 19 Oct 2011

CoreStyler wrote: I think KVR add just (or in a major part) plugins from big companies (waves, steinberg..). I tried to add my listing but they do not and do not reply to my submission....

can´t agree with that, i submitted my monoklon plugin (which is far away from being "professional plugin") and i am really not a big company, but only a small guy that makes fun projects with SM. so i think you´ll probably have to wait some days and then they willl list it.

dutchound · 6 Nov 2011

So who is in the KVR list? I am curious to see if there are any Synthmaker VST's in the top 20 or even the top 50! if not they're ought to be, and otherwise why not?

Are the bugs ironed out enough? what is holding Synthmaker back from being in the KVR lists?

adamszabo · 6 Nov 2011

JP6K is on the list :P

Dell · 12 Nov 2011

dutchound wrote: Are the bugs ironed out enough? what is holding Synthmaker back from being in the KVR lists?

What "bugs" are you referring to?

Being on KVR’s list is solely up to the developer. Personally, my traffic in terms of downloads from KVR members are too low to go through the trouble of using KVR’s database.

I would imagine it is nice to use KVR’s database as a starting point. However, as time progress, you will see where the bulk of the traffic stems from. Whether it is KVR or elsewhere, the key is to focus on sites that offer the bulk of your traffic.

There are lots of Synthmaker users however it does not mean they offer their work on KVR’s database.