Cool info Trog, as a guitar player I've never really put any more thought into it other than what Guitar Center can sell me as a pedal.
trogluddite ·
Neptune wrote: Should the modulator be bipolar or unipolar?
My understanding has always been that...
Unipolar = Amplitude modulation.
Bipolar = Ring modulation.
But the distinction is kind of historical - multiplication of waveforms is much easier than it used to be...
The name 'ring modulator' is nothing to do with the sound it generates, but is a description of the circuit used when making analogue electronic ring modulators.
With real circuits, controlling the amplitude of a signal is very easy with a VCA circuit - but that only lets you control the amplitude; if the modulator goes negative, most circuits would just stick at zero (kind of like a rectifier).
The ring modulator uses transformers connected in a loop "the ring", to create a circuit that can multiply two voltages regardless of their sign.
So traditionally, a ring modulator was the one to use if your modulator was bipolar.
In DSP,, multipliers just multiply, there's no limitation about what is positive or negative - though you will certainly get a slightly different sound with unipolar/bipolar modulators.
In most synths though, a ring modulator is part of the architecture of the synth rather than a 'guitar pedal' style add-on effect. In this context, RM usually means ring modulating one oscillator with another - so both signals would naturally be bipolar anyway - though there's no reason you couldn't have the option of a fixed oscillator (or variable keyboard tracking).
PS) Depending what your source and modulator signals are, you can generate some big DC offsets with a ring modulator (in-phase waveforms tend to generate only +ve numbers, 180deg out-of-phase mostly negative) - so it's often worth adding a DC offset remover.after the RM so that the output stays 'balanced'.
Wrote something here? To have a post removed or your name hidden, write to [email protected].